As recently reported, the Stiftung Warentest, recognized in the Federal Republic of Germany, has already reported on defamation on the Internet in April 2020, where it says: “According to the Augsburg Regional Court, there is an extradition request from Germany for the investment shark Rainer von Holst, who fled to the USA”.
Currently criminal charges are running in this context in several countries, against the E-Carat International and Freebay, including South Africa, the U.S., Europe and Asia, which has led to the fact that in the meantime both Europol and Interpol are involved, whereby Freebay demonstrably acted on behalf of KB Gold, this as a gold supplier, which is evidenced by trademark registrations of Rainer von Holst for these companies.
Currently, the U.S. Justice Authorities as well as the U.S. Embassy to the European Union (The U.S. Mission to the European Union – USEU Brussels) have been made aware of the illegal stay, as well as the investigative processes against Rainer von Holst (aka Jan Faber) and through media the question has been asked why the U.S. Justice Authorities allow Rainer von Holst to commit extortion and defamation from the U.S., although there is an extradition request?
The US judicial authorities will shortly be informed of the whereabouts of Rainer von Holst, since in the meantime “Bail Enforcement Agents or Fugitive Recovery Agents” are assigned to Rainer von Holst, who according to US law, just like any US citizen, may arrest a person upon information about an illegal offense, this is regulated by the “New York Penal Law” according to § 35.30(4). The same applies likewise in other US states! This US law is now to be applied by the Bail Enforcement Agent or Fugitive Recovery Agent to bring Rainer von Holst alias Jan to the German authorities.
An investigation is underway against Rainer von Holst aka Jan Faber and his criminal network at the General Public Prosecutor’s Office in Bamberg, in the Federal Republic of Germany, with the file number: 640 Js 512/17, here for the charges: extortion, financial market and media manipulation, money laundering and defamation.
The aforementioned in the Federal Republic of Germany recognized “Stiftung Warentest” writes about Rainer von Holst alias Jan Faber, after extensive research on 12.02. 2018:
The German Regional Court of Berlin states under file number: 27 O 223/17 on May 4, 2017:
The renowned German newspaper “Kyffhäuser Nachrichten” reports: “Rainer von Holst harms not only private investors, but also companies. Since October 2016, his sources of income have included a kind of protection racket against companies. For this purpose, he uses an online portal called ‘Gerlachreport’…Gerlachreport accuses companies of fraud and other criminal offenses. Legal resistance against the reputation-damaging articles prevents von Holst, by indicating no correct imprint, but an American letter box company. As a way out of the dilemma, he then offers the companies to remove the negative articles about them if they pay money for it.”
Another entrepreneur, who wishes to remain anonymous, said in this context, it all started with a mail, then a publication on extra programmed websites with slander, my life went literally overnight as broken as my business!
The criminal ploy of Rainer von Holst and the “journalists” he buys is always to blackmail companies and poach their customers. For this among other things by means of complex built web pages are programmed, in which exclusively lies in the style of the slander contain.
The fact that the “journalist” Jakob B. is accused of having published a media article in full knowledge of the non-existent shell company “Osint Group” is, as mentioned, the reason for an investigation by the German public prosecutor’s office in Hamburg. All this is currently being pursued by investigative authorities, where requests for legal assistance are certainly being made to other countries, primarily in order to locate the perpetrators by means of IP logs.
The way is clear for the law against hate and incitement on the net. The new regulation of the inventory data disclosure was passed a few days ago by the parliament (German Bundestag) and the Bundesrat of the Federal Republic of Germany, with which networks and search engine operators are obliged to delete punishable postings and in serious cases also to report to the German Federal Criminal Police Office, for criminal prosecution is made possible.
It must be mentioned at this point that Article 6 (2) of the European Convention on Human Rights stipulates that everyone is guaranteed the presumption of innocence under criminal law.